C03
Effects of variable input on word learning and word recognition in infants
PI(s): Prof. Dr. Barbara Höhle & Prof. Dr. Adamantios Gafos
Spoken language does not provide a one-to-one relation between properties of the acoustic signal and abstract symbolic representations. This raises the question of how infants can detect the lexically relevant phonetic dimensions in their speech input. This project evaluates the hypothesis that acoustic variability is essential for the establishment of stability in phonemic categories during language development. We will pursue this hypothesis by considering the effects of different types of variability on word learning and speech perception, taking into account data-driven learning mechanisms that support the lexical development in the individual.
in phase 1:
Effects of variable input on word learning and word recognition in infants
PI(s): Prof. Dr. Barbara Höhle & Prof. Dr. Adamantios Gafos
The project explores effects of phonetic and acoustic variability in the speech input on the basis of which phonological categories in early language acquisition are established. The main hypothesis pursued is that not all types of variability are equal: some types of variability support phonological category building whereas others do not support or even hinder their establishment. A major part of our experimental work consists in word learning experiments with 14-month-olds and more specifically word learning experiments where the presented stimuli are minimal pairs, that is, pairs of words differing in only one phoneme. Our focus is the hypothesis that only specific types of variability among acoustic parameters in these minimal pairs serve to highlight the phonologically relevant dimensions on the basis of which categories are built.
In a first research component, we have confirmed results from prior work that the presentation of the words in the to-be-learnt minimal pair from multiple speakers results in learning whereas presentation of the minimal pair by a single speaker does not result in a successful learning outcome. A subsequent study established that the advantage of variability in learning the minimal pair in the multiple speaker setting derives from properties of the acoustic signal; when variability was presented in the visual forms of the stimuli (rather than in their acoustic forms), learning was unsuccessful.
In a third research component, we are exploring the hypothesis that phonological categories in natural speech observe specific relations of covariability among the acoustic cues that express the phonological contrasts in these categories. Two related aims are pursued here. The first is to better understand if and how sensitivity to these co-variance relations depends on age; the second is whether stimuli with variability that conforms to these natural relations found in speech are learned better than stimuli which contain the same degree of variability but conform to different relations from those found in natural speech.
In pursuing the above aims, the project employs a number of different experimental methods used in language development research paradigms: eye-tracking coupled with habilitation and familiarization techniques, word learning experiments, and analyses of pupil dilation changes in response to paired acoustic-visual stimuli.
Members
Publications
- Peer-Reviewed: Papers, Journals, Books, Articles of the CRC
- Talk or Presentation: Talks, Presentations, Posters of the CRC
- SFB-Related: not produced in connection with the CRC, but are thematically appropriate
- Other: Papers, Journals, Books, Articles of the CRC, but not peer-reviewed
Author(s) | Title | Year | Published in | Links |
---|---|---|---|---|
Höhle, B., Fritzsche, T., Mess, K., Philipp, M., & Gafos, A. | Only the right noise? Effects of phonetic and visual input variability on 14-month-olds' minimal pair word learning. | 2020 | Developmental Science, 23(5), e12950. DOI: 10.1111/desc.12950 | |
Höhle, B., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Nazzi, T. | Variability and stability in early language acquisition: Comparing monolingual and bilingual infants' speech perception and word recognition. | 2019 | Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 56-71. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728919000348 | |
Boll-Avetisyan, N., Bhatara, A., & Höhle, B. | Processing of Rhythm in Speech and Music in Adult Dyslexia. | 2020 | Brain Sciences, 10(5), 261. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10050261 | |
Höhle, B., Fritzsche, T., Boll-Avetisyan, N., Hullebus, M., & Gafos, A. I. | Respect the surroundings: Effects of phonetic context variability on infants' learning of minimal pairs. | 2021 | JASA Express Letters, 1(2), 024401. DOI: 10.1121/10.0003574 | |
Tobin, S., Hullebus, M., & Gafos, A. I. | Immediate phonetic convergence in a cue-distractor paradigm. | 2018 | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(6), EL528. DOI: 10.1121/1.5082984 | |
Omane, P. O., & Höhle, B. | Acquiring Syntactic Variability: The Production of Wh-Questions in Children and Adults Speaking Akan. | 2021 | Frontiers in Communication, 6. DOI: 10.3389/fcomm.2021.604951 | |
Marimon, M., Höhle, B., & Langus, A. | Pupillary entrainment reveals individual differences in cue weighting in 9-month-old German-learning infants. | 2022 | Cognition, 224, 105054. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105054 | |
Hullebus, M., Gafos, A., Boll-Avetisyan, N., Langus, A., Fritzsche, T., & Höhle, B. | Infant preference for specific phonetic cue relations in the contrast between voiced and voiceless stops. | 2024 | Infancy, 1-17. DOI: 10.1111/infa.12630 |